Foaming at the Mouth

Well bless your heart! You didn't just open Pandora's box with this challenge, you took a sledge hammer to it then burned the motherfucker to ashes. What is bothering me right now? Okay, you naughty glutton for punishment, you asked for it!

1. The state of music today is a joke: You don't have to study and master an instrument, you don't have to have vocal range, all you gotta do is be purdy and autotune does the rest. Real musicians don't need to be good looking. Their talent is what matters. You need examples? Keith Richards and Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones. Keith was ugly before embalming himself with heroin, cocaine, alcohol, and nicotine. Now, a three thousand year old mummy looks more youthful. In short, Keith put the ug in ugly. Still, no one can play rhythm like good ol' Keith. Now, Mick just turned 80 and the dude still struts across the fucking stage like a god. The lips that made him a sex symbol in the1960's and 1970's have lost their elasticity to the point that if a stiff wind hit them ol' Mick would be sent sailing into the next county. None of this matters because it is Keith and Mick's talent that ensures that Stones still fill stadiums to this day. Dollar for fucking donuts the only thing Taylor Swift and Justin Bieber will be able to fill when they hit their 70's is their diapers and even doing that will require autotune!

2. The 21st century's bat guano crazy cult of personality: People used to admire the likes of Harriet Tubman, Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Gandhi, Shakespeare, and Socrates. These individuals, though certainly imperfect had the courage and character that made them worthy of admiration. Who enjoys worship today? Social media influencers, sports stars, and (gag) the Kardashians. I have so many problems with these modern influences I just about foam at the mouth. Here's why:

a) Social media influencers: Exactly what is it they do that is worthy of influencing anyone? I mean, they're not trying to end world hunger or social injustice. Nope. Most of the time, they are promoting the stuff their sponsors pay them to schlep be it clothing, technology, or all things banal. Um when did we decide to emulate fucking commercials? I don't recall ever being compelled to be like Cap'n Crunch or Mr. Clean. Are we so materialistic that we worship the people who's basic purpose is to sell stuff?

b) Athletes: Now, I am a huge football fan. I grew up watching the Detroit Lions lose year in and year out. However, though I loved Barry Sanders, Herman Moore, and Calvin Johnson, they didn't influence me beyond the football field. Don't get me wrong, a lot of athletes do a lot of good off the field with charity work. However, for every athlete who dedicates their time to a worthy cause, there seems to be a douche bag who feels that their ability to catch a ball or hit a ball with a stick makes them above the law and basic human decency. The sick thing is the team owners and fans often give the players a pass for their bad behavior because they are athletically gifted. Many players have been caught beating their girlfriends, doing drugs, and even engaging in gang violence. Instead of being drummed out of their sport, they are often given the label of, "Bad Boy" and allowed to play until the negative press starts to become a distraction to the entire team or hurts ticket and merchandise sales. In short, a douche bag is a douche bag no matter how many touchdowns they catch or homeruns they hit. Character matters and awful human beings shouldn't be in the limelight just because they are good at playing a game.

3. The Kardashians: This one blows my mind. These vapid, self-centered, walking, talking, STD worst case scenarios are fucking billionaires. Why? I hear everyone talk about their business savvy. Okay, so they no how to market themselves. Unfortunately, what they market is materialism and the idea that women need to look a certain way to be successful and desirable. They make sure that the press is aware that their 5 year old's birthday party cost more than an average house and their kid's wear clothes that cost thousands of dollars. Look, women are the future and I can't wait for women to have their chance to turn the shit show that is humanity around. Unfortunately, vapid, self-promoting women who bring nothing worth while to the table like the Kardashians are preventing our new female overlords (overladies?) from taking over for the old, rich, men who have been fucking things up for centuries.

4. The blurring of opinion and fact (forgive me for getting political here): When the fuck did someone's opinion deserve to be proclaimed as the way things should be? This one has the potential to destroy the world. The conservative and liberal ideologies in this country insist that their views are absolutely right and there is no room for debate. To ask a question is to raise the standard of opposition. Both sides are guilty of this to one extreme or another, so both need to be called out.

a) Conservatives have been promoting the idea that the American way of life is under attack by those tree hugging, climate change fear mongering, LBGTQ agenda promoting, communist, liberals who hate America. They proclaim that there is a liberal conspiracy that seeks to make their children into godless, Anti-American, gender nonconforming, commies. Instead of creating an open forum to determine if these beliefs are true, laws are being passed in conservative states banning books, the free expression of sexuality or gender identity, a woman's right to choose, and even mandates that the nation's history of racism be glossed over in schools as if the problem has been solved. In short, conservatives are legislating their belief systems into reality. They are hinging everything on the idea that if it is against the law it doesn't exist and if anyone says otherwise, they are subject to punishment.

b) Liberals are just as quick to point the finger at conservatives as being the root of all evil. Their tactics are equally self-righteous and more annoying than anything. For example, many liberals feel that to question their belief means that the person who asks the question is against them. This isn't always true. For example, PETA often gives out pamphlets at local colleges in my neck of the woods decrying the evils of eating meat and using animal based products. Now, we are surrounded by dairies, beef cattle, poultry and pig farms. In short this part of California's economy is driven by all things PETA defines as evil. When I was in college I observed a fellow student ask a member of PETA, "Okay say we stop eating meat and using animal based products, what are we going to do with the MILLIONS of domesticated farm animals?" The member of PETA's response was to blow a gasket and claim that the question was sarcastic and hateful. Personally, I think it's a good question. Maybe the guy who asked the question was open to PETA's ideology, he just wanted to know if there was a plan for the farm animals. It seems more cruel to blindly free domesticated animals who lack the instincts and means to care for themselves into the world. I am guessing that thousands of these animals would die of starvation and sickness. Many liberals want change and their hearts are in the right place most of the time, but they fail to realize that they need to justify why they want change, offer to seek compromise, and also have a clue as to how to deal with the challenges that the change will create. In short, their belief may be valid TO THEM, but to others it is problematic and potentially more cruel than what the belief is so against.

Okay, I have fumed, foamed at the mouth, and declared what is currently tying my nuts in a knot. In the spirit of respectful discourse, no one needs to agree with me. I value any and all opinions so long as they don't promote violence against someone else. So, feel free to disagree, just don't force me to listen to Taylor Swift or Justin Bieber, that would be perpetrating audio violence against this bald headed, inbred, cranky, social worker.